The most quoted book of practical philosophy in the world is a private notebook that its author never prepared for publication, never titled, and almost certainly never expected anyone else to open.
That is the strange fact underneath Meditations. It is not a treatise. It has no argument that builds, no chapters in the ordinary sense, no reader being addressed. It is a Roman emperor writing to himself in Greek, mostly while on campaign, repeating the same handful of instructions because they kept not sticking.
I went in expecting philosophy and came out with something closer to a journal audit. What struck me was not the polish of the famous lines but how much of the book is a man telling himself things he had clearly already told himself, in almost the same words, weeks or months apart. If you have ever flipped back through your own notebook and found the same resolution written four times in a year, you are reading a very old pattern.
What follows are nine things the text shows about journaling for no audience but yourself. It belongs beside the other journals of successful people worth studying.
1. It Was Never Written For You
There is no evidence Marcus gave the work a title. The Greek title usually reported, ta eis heauton, translates roughly as “to himself,” and the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry on Marcus Aurelius notes that it derives from a manuscript now lost and may well be a later addition, first recorded around AD 900 by the Byzantine bishop Arethas. The first recorded mention of the work at all comes from Themistius, in AD 364, roughly two centuries after Marcus died.
The IEP describes the surviving text plainly: it “take[s] the form of a personal notebook” and was probably written while Marcus was on campaign in central Europe, around AD 171-175. The entries appear in no particular order, and may simply be in the order they were composed.
That matters for how you read it. Nothing in Meditations is arranged for effect. When it is repetitive, that is not bad editing but a record of what a person actually needed to keep saying. A journal with no audience does not have to be coherent, does not have to progress, and does not have to be interesting. If you have been quietly editing your own entries for a reader who does not exist, Marcus is the strongest available argument that you can stop.
2. He Wrote It During the Worst Years, Not the Best
Marcus reigned from AD 161 to his death in 180, sharing the throne with his adoptive brother Lucius Verus until Verus died in 169. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy summarises the reign bluntly: it was troubled by attacks from Germany, rebellions in northern Italy and Egypt, and an outburst of plague, and at least part of Meditations was written during the last years of his military campaigns.
The text carries two of its only location notes at the ends of its first two books. After Book 1, in George Long’s translation, sits the line “Among the Quadi at the Granua.” After Book 2: “This in Carnuntum.” The Granua is probably the river Gran, a tributary of the Danube. Carnuntum was a garrison town on the Danube in Pannonia, about thirty miles east of modern Vienna.
Strip the philosophy away and you have a man in a military camp on a cold northern frontier, in the middle of a war and an epidemic, writing short notes to steady himself. There was no quiet study, no unbroken hour, no good year. The notebook exists because the years were bad, not despite it.
Try this: next time you skip an entry because the day was too chaotic, write three sentences anyway and mark the location at the top, the way Marcus marked Carnuntum. Not the date. The place.
3. Book One Is a List of Debts, Not Achievements
Meditations opens in a way almost no modern journal does. Book 1 is a catalogue of named people and exactly what Marcus learned from each of them. Not a list of what he had accomplished. A list of what he owed.
From my grandfather Verus [I learned] good morals and the government of my temper.
From the reputation and remembrance of my father, modesty and a manly character.
From my mother, piety and beneficence, and abstinence, not only from evil deeds, but even from evil thoughts.
Source: Marcus Aurelius, Meditations 1.1-1.3, translated by George Long (1862), from the Project Gutenberg edition of Long’s translation.
The entries get more specific as they go. From his teacher Rusticus he received “the impression that my character required improvement and discipline,” along with the habit of reading carefully rather than being “satisfied with a superficial understanding” (1.7). Book 1 closes by thanking the gods for good grandparents, good parents, a good sister, good teachers, “nearly everything good” (1.17). Scholars have long noticed that Book 1 sits oddly against the rest and may have been composed separately. Whatever its origin, it functions as an inventory: a person working out, in writing, whose fingerprints are on his character.
Most gratitude journaling stays at the level of objects and events. This is gratitude with attribution, and it is a much harder page to write. If you are unsure what to write in a journal on a day when nothing has happened, this page never runs out.
Try this: name six people, living or dead, you can trace a specific habit or attitude back to. One line each, and name the trait, not the relationship. “From X, the habit of waiting a day before replying angrily” is the shape you are after.
4. He Said the Same Things Again and Again
This is the part that changed how I read the book. Marcus wrote a morning entry in Book 2:
Begin the morning by saying to thyself, I shall meet with the busybody, the ungrateful, arrogant, deceitful, envious, unsocial. All these things happen to them by reason of their ignorance of what is good and evil.
Source: Marcus Aurelius, Meditations 2.1, translated by George Long (1862).
Then he wrote another morning entry, in Book 5, about the same hour of the same kind of day:
In the morning when thou risest unwillingly, let this thought be present: I am rising to the work of a human being. Why then am I dissatisfied if I am going to do the things for which I exist and for which I was brought into the world? Or have I been made for this, to lie in the bed-clothes and keep myself warm?
Source: Marcus Aurelius, Meditations 5.1, translated by George Long (1862).
The same instruction returns in other forms. “Wipe out the imagination. Stop the pulling of the strings. Confine thyself to the present” (7.29). Then, later: “Wipe out thy imaginations by often saying to thyself: Now it is in my power to let no badness be in this soul” (8.29). Note the phrase he slips in – by often saying to thyself. He knew he was repeating himself. The repetition was the method.
The IEP treats this repetition of themes as evidence for the notebook theory: a text assembled for use, not for readers, will naturally circle. For a journaler it is more than a scholarly clue. It is permission.
Almost everyone who keeps a notebook eventually feels embarrassed at how little new material their inner life produces. The same three worries. The same two resolutions. Marcus, with an empire and every teacher money could buy, did the only sensible thing about it, which was to keep writing them down. Repetition is not a sign that journaling has failed. It is what building a journaling habit that actually sticks looks like from the inside, and Henry David Thoreau’s two million word journal shows the same at larger scale: volume comes from returning, not novelty.
Try this: go back through three months of your journal and find the sentence you have written most often in different words. Copy it out on a fresh page, once, deliberately. That sentence is your actual current project.
5. He Wrote in the Second Person, to Himself
Read almost any page and the grammar gives the game away. Marcus is not describing his day. He is issuing instructions to a person he is standing slightly apart from.
Every moment think steadily as a Roman and a man to do what thou hast in hand with perfect and simple dignity […] and to give thyself relief from all other thoughts.
Source: Marcus Aurelius, Meditations 2.5, translated by George Long (1862).
“Thou,” “thyself,” the imperative mood throughout. The translation makes this feel archaic, but the underlying move is not. It is the split every journaler performs without naming it: the part of you writing and the part of you being written to. It keeps reappearing in people who had never read each other. Bruce Lee filled pages with instructions addressed to himself, which is what makes the many journals of Bruce Lee read so strangely like a Stoic handbook. Benjamin Franklin built a tracked, corrective daily system out of the same instinct.
There is a practical reason it works. “I am anxious about the meeting” is a report. “You know what you are actually afraid of here, so name it” is an intervention. The second asks something of you.
Try this: take an entry you have already written and rewrite three sentences of it addressed to yourself as “you.” Do not soften it and do not make it harsh. Notice what changes when the sentence has a direction.
6. Failing and Returning Is the Practice
Somewhere in Book 5 there is a passage that reads less like philosophy than like a note left for a future bad morning.
Be not disgusted, nor discouraged, nor dissatisfied, if thou dost not succeed in doing everything according to right principles, but when thou hast failed, return back again […] and do not return to philosophy as if she were a master, but act like those who have sore eyes and apply a bit of sponge and egg.
Source: Marcus Aurelius, Meditations 5.9, translated by George Long (1862).
He assumes failure as the normal case. The instruction is not “try harder,” it is “return.” And the medical image makes philosophy a remedy you apply when your eyes hurt, not a schoolmaster who marks you down.
This is where Meditations pairs most closely with another journal on this site. Samuel Johnson kept a diary of resolutions he restated for decades and mostly did not keep – “to rise early,” written in his twenties and still being written on his sixty-eighth birthday. Sixteen centuries apart, two very different men produced the same artefact: a private notebook whose main content is the repeated intention to do better, plus the evidence that it did not take.
Read as scorecards, both journals are records of failure. Read as what they are, they are records of returning. Johnson kept writing the resolution. Marcus kept writing the reminder. Neither treated the gap as a reason to stop keeping the book.
Try this: on the next day you break a streak, open the journal and write only the word “returning,” followed by one sentence about what you are returning to. Do not explain the gap. The explanation is where most people quit.
7. Keep the Principles Short
One of the most useful passages in the book for a journaler is not about writing at all, on the surface.
Men seek retreats for themselves, houses in the country, sea-shores, and mountains; and thou too art wont to desire such things very much. But this is altogether a mark of the most common sort of men, for it is in thy power whenever thou shalt choose to retire into thyself. […] Constantly then give to thyself this retreat, and renew thyself; and let thy principles be brief and fundamental.
Source: Marcus Aurelius, Meditations 4.3, translated by George Long (1862).
Brief and fundamental. That is a specification for a journal page, and a rebuke to the way most of us write when we are agitated, which is at length and in circles. Much of Meditations obeys its own rule. Whole sections run to a line or two: “Do not act as if thou wert going to live ten thousand years. Death hangs over thee. While thou livest, while it is in thy power, be good” (4.17). No preamble, no working out. Just the compressed conclusion, written where he could find it again.
There is a useful distinction here between the page where you think and the page where you store what you concluded. Ralph Waldo Emerson worked this way deliberately, mining his 263 notebooks for lines he could reuse. If you are deciding how to structure your journal, one of the most durable structures is exactly this: long entries wherever you need them, plus a short standing list of the principles you keep relearning.
Try this: end your next long entry with one sentence beginning “So the rule is.” Keep those sentences somewhere separate. After three months you will have your own Book 4.
8. He Used the Notebook to Keep the Job From Changing Him
Marcus had absolute power and wrote a private note warning himself about what absolute power does to people.
Take care that thou art not made into a Caesar, that thou art not dyed with this dye; for such things happen. Keep thyself then simple, good, pure, serious, free from affectation, a friend of justice.
Source: Marcus Aurelius, Meditations 6.30, translated by George Long (1862).
“Dyed with this dye” is the image doing the work. He is not worried about a bad decision. He is worried about the slow staining of character by a role, which is not the kind of thing you notice on the day it happens. The only reliable way to catch a drift that slow is to have written down, in advance, who you were before it started.
Most journaling advice treats the notebook as a place to process what happened. Marcus uses it as a fixed reference point to measure himself against later – closer to how a journal supports clearer decision-making than to a diary of events.
When I go back through my own old entries I do not usually find drift. I find something I did not expect: a younger version of me trying to form into the person I am now, and a current version slightly in awe that it worked. That is the same mechanism Marcus is describing, running the other way. He kept a fixed record because he was afraid the role would change him for the worse. The record works in both directions. You cannot know whether you drifted or arrived unless something is written down from before you started.
9. This Is Also the Most Misquoted Journal in the World
Because the book is quotable and out of copyright in several translations, an enormous quantity of material circulates under Marcus’s name that he did not write. Some is loose paraphrase. Some is invented outright. Some is Seneca. But Meditations is unusually easy to check, because it has a real citation system: every passage has a book and section number that stays stable across translations.
Take the most viral line of all, usually given as “the impediment to action advances action; what stands in the way becomes the way.” That one is real. It is Book 5.20, and here is how George Long renders the same passage:
[F]or the mind converts and changes every hindrance to its activity into an aid; and so that which is a hindrance is made a furtherance to an act; and that which is an obstacle on the road helps us on this road.
Source: Marcus Aurelius, Meditations 5.20, translated by George Long (1862).
The famous version is Gregory Hays’s much tighter English from his 2003 translation, not a different or better original. Both are Book 5.20. The compression belongs to the translator.
If you keep a commonplace section in your notebook, this is the argument for recording where things came from. A quote without a source is one you will eventually have to check or discard. A quote with “Meditations 5.20” beside it is one you can defend for life. The same discipline works for anything you copy down, including journal prompts.
Try this: pick the three quotations you have copied into your journal most often and spend twenty minutes finding the actual source of each.
What Survived, and Why It Matters
The transmission of the text is its own argument for keeping a notebook. Meditations came very close to not existing: no publication, no circulation in Marcus’s lifetime that we know of, no mention of it for nearly two centuries. The modern text derives primarily from two sources, a manuscript now in the Vatican and a manuscript since lost, on which the first printed edition of 1558 was based. Wilhelm Xylander’s edition of that year, digitised by the Bayerische Staatsbibliothek, is the reason a private Roman notebook became a book at all.
Everything the world now quotes from Marcus Aurelius rests on a couple of manuscript survivals and one sixteenth-century scholar deciding a stray Greek text was worth setting in type. Nobody planned that. He wrote badly organised, repetitive, self-correcting notes in a tent on a freezing river frontier because writing them helped him get through the next day. That they outlived the empire is an accident. That they worked, for him, at the time, is not.
You will almost certainly not be read in eighteen hundred years. That is not a reason to write less honestly. It is the only condition under which most people can write honestly at all. If you want to read him first, Meric Casaubon’s 1634 rendering is free, and so is George Rendall’s 1898 version, published as Marcus Aurelius Antoninus to Himself and available at the Internet Archive. If you want to start writing, journaling for beginners is a reasonable first step.
The equestrian statue on the Capitoline is the image everyone knows: the calm ruler, arm extended, entirely in command. The Capitoline Museums hold the original bronze. The notebook shows a different man – one who had to remind himself, in writing, over and over, not to lie in bed, not to be angry at difficult people, and not to be dyed by his own job. That gap between the statue and the notebook is the whole case for journaling.
Want more journals like this one? I send an email on what the notebooks of writers, scientists, artists and, apparently, Roman emperors reveal about keeping a journal that survives contact with a real life. Subscribe here.
Featured image: Marcus Aurelius, Roman marble portrait bust. Photo by Gary Todd, CC0, via Wikimedia Commons.
